Fri 23 Apr 2010
Asphalt from roofing shingles in pavement mix designs
Posted by admin under Mobile Shingle Grinding , Recovery & Recycling , Shingle RecyclingNo Comments
In a presentation at the 2010 TERRA Pavement Research Conference, Curt Turgeon, a pavement engineer at Mn/DOT’s Office of Materials, discussed the department’s use of asphalt obtained from tear-off roofing shingles scrap (TOSS) in pavement.
Nothing that about 230,000 tons of discarded shingles go into Minnesota’s landfills every year, Turgeon said there was initial enthusiasm about this source of asphalt when it was first discussed several years ago. “But then reality set in! People pointed out that shingle asphalt is not paving asphalt. They worried that spending 10 to 30 years on a roof probably doesn’t improve the asphalts’ qualities. Furthermore, shingles come off roofs along with a lot of junk—and they might contain asbestos.”
Accordingly, Turgeon said, it was decided that there would need to be both quality control and limitations on how much asphalt from TOSS could be included in pavements. To address the asbestos issue, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency funded a Mn/DOT research project. Testing The office of Materials test 17 different asphalt samples with varying combinations of asphalt from four sources:
- Tear-off roofing shingle scrap (TOSS)
- Manufactured waste shingle scrap (MWSS)
- Reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP; all from a shingle source except in one formulation)
- Virgin Asphalt
A chemistry test showed that, when subjected to bending stress, four of the samples (see table) with formulations likely to be used in pavements had essentially identical properties.
Another test showed that, in general, the more old asphalt from tear-off shingles is included in a mix, the stiffer the mix is at low temperature—and therefore the more likely it is to exhibit thermal cracking.
Asbestos in pavement?
Turgeon referred to the possibility that TOSS might contain asbestos as a “lighting rod issue”. However, in tests conducted by a third-party laboratory on more than 1,000 samples taken from DemCon, a shingle recycler in Shakopee, Minnesota, no asbestos has yet been found, he reported. Turgeon directed anyone with questions about the asbestos issue to Wayne Gjerde at wayne.gierde@pca.state.mn.us.
Purity standards
Turgeon also discussed strategies for avoiding contaminants in TOSS. Working with DemCon, Mn/DOT has developed a four-part strategy:
- Charge roofers less if they pre-sort and bring in cleaner loads.
- Workers pull out the largest non-shingle material such as boards and pallets.
- Workers hand-sort materials moving past them on a conveyor.
- Run the resulting material through a shredder that also pulls out nails with magnets.
Mn/DOT’s standard for the resulting material is that 100 percent must pass through a ½-inch sieve, 90 percent must pass a #4 screen and there must be less than .05 percent “deleterious material”. Turgeon added that the maximum amount of deleterious material is half a percent of five percent—that’s pretty low. However, a slightly larger pieces of TOSS occasionally gets through—so you have a little ‘tab’ popping up on the surface of the pavement, and that doesn’t seem to be much of a problem.” Standards for MWSS and TOSS are part of Mn/DOT’s bituminous standard and can be found at www.dot.state.mn.us/materials/bituminousdocs/Special_Provisions/2009/Shinlges/Table%202360.3-B2_Agg_Reg_2010.pdf. LTAP –Richard Kronick, LTAP freelancer
Source: Minnesota Technology Exchange: ‘Pavement Conference’